© 2024 WFAE

Mailing Address:
WFAE 90.7
P.O. Box 896890
Charlotte, NC 28289-6890
Tax ID: 56-1803808
90.7 Charlotte 93.7 Southern Pines 90.3 Hickory 106.1 Laurinburg
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Barrett Clarifies Comments On LGBTQ Rights After Criticism From Sen. Hirono

Judge Amy Coney Barrett apologized for using the term "sexual preference" when discussing the outcome of the 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which granted marriage rights to same-sex couples.

Barrett's comments were a response to a lengthy statement by Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, who detailed why many in the LGBTQ community may be concerned that the rights granted in Obergefellcould be overturned if Barrett is confirmed to the Supreme Court.

"Not once but twice you used the term 'sexual preferences' to describe those in the LGBTQ community," Hirono said. "Let me make clear, 'sexual preference' is an offensive and outdated term. It is used by anti-LGTBQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice."

Hirono went on to say that sexual orientation is a key part of a person's identity and argued that former Justice Antonin Scalia, whose judicial philosophy Barrett has said she follows, dissented in the Obergefelldecision.

"That sexual orientation is both a normal expression of human sexuality and immutable, was a key part of the majority's opinion in Obergefell," Hirono said. "Which, by the way, Scalia did not agree with."

Hirono ended her remarks without allowing Barrett to respond. After the next committee member, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, began, Barrett asked to speak directly to Hirono's comments.

"I certainly didn't mean and would never mean to use a term that would cause any offense in the LGBTQ community," Barrett said. "If I did, I greatly apologize for that. I simply meant to be referring to Obergefell's holding with regard to same-sex marriage."

Barrett also explained that she has declined to answer questions about her view on Obergefellfor the same reason she has declined to comment on other court rulings.

"I was certainly not indicating disagreement with it," Barrett said. "The point of now answering was to simply say it was in appropriate for me to say a response."

Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Kelsey Snell is a Congressional correspondent for NPR. She has covered Congress since 2010 for outlets including The Washington Post, Politico and National Journal. She has covered elections and Congress with a reporting specialty in budget, tax and economic policy. She has a graduate degree in journalism from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. and an undergraduate degree in political science from DePaul University in Chicago.